skip to content skip to search

Agenda

Thursday, February 23, 2012

9:30 AM start time
Utilities represented: Energy Facilities, Electricity, Natural Gas


To view all documents related to the following Agenda items, visit eDockets


DELIBERATION ITEMS
No Items


DECISION ITEMS

1 ET2/TL-08-1474 Great River Energy;
Xcel Energy
Approved with conditions. 
 

In the Matter of the Route Permit Application for a 345 kV Transmission Line from Brookings County, South Dakota to Hampton, Minnesota.

Should the Commission authorize a minor alteration for the Brookings to Hampton transmission line project?
If so, what conditions, if any, should attach to the minor alteration? (PUC: Kaluzniak; DOC: Briefing Papers - Ek)

2

IP6824/WS-09-830

West Stevens Wind, LLC Approved with modifications. 
 

In the Matter of the Site Permit Application for a 20 Megawatt (MW) Large Wind Energy Conversion System (LWECS) in Stevens County, Minnesota.

Should the Commission amend the site permit per West Stevens Wind, LLC’s petition? (PUC: DeBleeckere; DOC: Briefing PapersEk)

3 E004/M-11-838 Great Plains Natural Gas Company Approved. 
 

Petition of Great Plans Natural Gas Company for a Variance to Minnesota Rules, part 7820.4000. (PUC: Rebholz; DOC: Comments - Medhaug)

**4

E002/M-11-1101

Xcel Energy Approved as modified. 
 

In the Matter of a Petition by Xcel Energy for Approval of a Financial Performance Incentive for Qualifying Solar Projects Under Minn. Stat. 216B.241, Subd. 5a.

Should the Commission approve Xcel's request for a new financial performance incentive for qualifying solar projects? (PUC: Briefing Papers / Revised Decision Alternatives - Mackenzie)

**5 G008/GR-08-1075 CenterPoint Energy Approved to adjust bills, recover cost fia fuel clause. 
 

In the Matter of an Application by CenterPoint Energy for Authority to Increase Natural Gas Rates in Minnesota.

Should the Commission approve CenterPoint's proposal for bill adjustments to address the impact of inverted block gas cost recovery in 2010 and 2011 as filed?
If not, should the Commission require CenterPoint to modify its proposal?
Alternatively, should the Commission reject CenterPoint's proposal and require CenterPoint to make bill adjustments paid for by the Company? (PUC: Briefing Papers - Harding)

**6

E015/M-11-806

Minnesota Power Reconsidered and reaffirmed. 
 

In the Matter of a Petition by Minnesota Power for Approval of a Rider for Facilities Franchise Fee.

Should the Commission reconsider any part of its October 21, 2011, ORDER FINDING JURISDICTION, APPROVING RIDER AND NOTICE, AND REQUIRING FILING? (PUC: Briefing Papers - Rebholz)

The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument. (Minnesota Rules 7829.3000, Subpart 6) In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting. If you have questions about this particular docket, please contact Michelle Rebholz at 651-201-2206.

**7 E,G999/CI-11-851 All Rate-Regulated Utilities No action taken.
 

In the Matter of the Review of Utility Practices Regarding Establishment of and Changes in Responsibility for Utility Bill Payment.

Should the Commission require utilities to change their billing practices regarding transferring responsibility for utility bills and/or charging tenants in multi-unit buildings for de minimis common usage? (PUC: Briefing Papers - Rebholz, Bjorklund)

The following item will not be heard before 11:00 a.m.

**8

IP6701/WS-08-1233

AWA Goodhue, LLC Denied.  
 

In the Matter of the AWA Goodhue, LLC 78 Megawatt Large Wind Energy Conversion System in Goodhue County, Minnesota.

Should the Commission approve the Permittee’s Avian and Bat Protection Plan compliance filing? (PUC: DeBleeckere; DOC: Briefing Papers - MacAlister, Hartman)

  * One star indicates agenda item is unusual but is not disputed.
** Two stars indicate a disputed item or significant legal or procedural issue to be resolved.
(Ex Parte Rules apply)