|
|
Agenda
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
9:30 AM start time
Utilities represented: Energy Facilities
|
To view all documents related to the following Agenda items, visit eDockets
|
DELIBERATION ITEMS
No Items
|
DECISION ITEMS
| 1 |
E002/TL-10-1026 |
Xcel Energy |
Environmental Assessment found adequate; permit issued. |
| |
In the Matter of the Route Permit Application for the St. Cloud Loop 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Sauk Rapids, Minnesota.
Should the Commission find that the environmental assessment and the record adequately address the issues identified in the scoping decision?
Should the Commission issue a high-voltage transmission line route permit identifying a specific route and permit conditions? (PUC: Kaluzniak; DOC: DOC/EFP Briefing Papers - Ek)
|
| 2 |
ET2/TL-11-867
|
Great River Energy |
Application accepted; DOC to appoint public advisor and Advisory Task Force. |
| |
In the Matter of the Route Permit Application by Great River Energy for the Parkers Prairie 115 kV Transmission Line Project in Otter Tail County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission accept or reject the application as substantially complete?
If accepted, should the Commission authorize the Department to appoint a public advisor and an advisory task force? (PUC: Kaluzniak; DOC: Briefing Papers - Kirsch)
|
| 3 |
IP6855/WS-11-608 |
TCI Renewables Limited for Ellerth Wind LLC |
Application accepted; DOC to appoint public advisor; variance granted. |
| |
In the Matter of the Site Permit Application of Ellerth Wind LLC for a 98.9 MW Large Wind Energy Conversion System in Marshall County.
Should the Commission Accept the Application as complete and assign a Public Advisor?
Should the Commission vary Minnesota Rules, part 7854.0800 to allow more time for a preliminary determination on whether a draft permit should be issued or denied for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System? (PUC: DeBleeckere; DOC: Briefing Papers - Hartman)
|
| **4A |
E002,ET2/TL-09-1056 |
Undersander et. al. |
Petition denied. |
| |
In the Matter of the Application for a Route Permit for the Fargo to St. Cloud 345 kV Transmission Line Project.
Should the Commission accept and consider the petition for a permit amendment from the Undersanders et al?
Should the Commission approve the proposed permit amendment? (PUC: Briefing Papers - Eknes)
|
| *4B |
E002,ET2/TL-09-1056
|
Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy;
Great River Energy |
All but one requested minor alteration adopted; Permittees will continue stakeholder dialogue on remaining request. |
| |
In the Matter of the Application for a Route Permit for the Fargo to St. Cloud 345 kV Transmission Line Project.
Should the Commission authorize the Permittees’ Request for Permit Amendments? (PUC: Eknes; (DOC: Briefing Papers -
Birkholz)
|
* One star indicates agenda item is unusual but is not disputed.
** Two stars indicate a disputed item or significant legal or procedural issue to be resolved.
(Ex Parte Rules apply)
|
|