|
|
Agenda
Thursday, April 14, 2011
9:30 AM start time
Utilities represented: Telecom, Energy Facilities, Natural Gas, Electricity
|
To view all documents related to the following Agenda items, visit eDockets
|
DELIBERATION ITEMS
No Items
|
DECISION ITEMS
| *1 |
P523,5750/PA-10-1212
|
Federated Telephone Cooperative d/b/a Federated Telephone;
HomeTown Solutions, LLC d/b/a Federated Telephone |
Notice requirement removed. |
| |
Joint Petition of Federated Telephone Cooperative d/b/a Federated Telephone and HomeTown Solutions, LLC d/b/a Federated Telephone for Approval of Transfer of Assets and Authority. (PUC: Oberlander; DOC: Comments - Linscheid) NOTE: Staff supports the Department’s recommendations in this matter.
|
| 2 |
IP6858/WS-11-195
|
Shell Rock Wind Farm, LLC |
Application accepted and further determinations made. |
| |
In the Matter of the Site Permit Application of Shell Rock Wind Farm, LLC for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System in Freeborn County.
Should the Commission Accept the Site Permit Application of Shell Rock Wind Farm, LLC for a Large Wind Energy Conversion System as complete and assign a Public Advisor? (PUC: DeBleeckere; OES: Comments and Recommendations - Bjorklund)
|
| 3 |
IP6838/TL-10-134
|
Prairie Rose Transmission, LLC |
Application accepted and further determinations made. |
| |
In the Matter of the Prairie Rose Transmission, LLC Route Permit Application for a 115 kV Transmission Line in Rock County for Interconnection of the Prairie Rose Wind Farm (WS-10-425).
Should the Commission accept the application as substantially complete? If accepted, should the Commission authorize the OES to appoint a public advisor and an advisory task force? (PUC: Kaluzniak; OES: Comments and Recommendations - Birkholz)
|
| **4 |
ET2/TL-08-1474
|
Great River Energy;
Northern States Power, d/b/a Xcel Energy |
Denied reconsideration. |
| |
In the Matter of the Route Permit Application for a 345 kV Transmission Line from Brookings County, South Dakota, to Hampton, Minnesota.
Should the Commission reconsider its decision granting a route permit for the remanded portion (segment 4) of the route? (PUC: Revised Briefing Papers
- Kaluzniak)
The Commission has the authority to accept or decline a petition for reconsideration with or without a hearing or oral argument (Minnesota Rules, part 7829.3000, subpart 6). In other words, a decision on a petition for reconsideration can be made without taking oral comments at the Commission meeting.
|
| 5 |
G008/M-11-113
|
CenterPoint Energy |
Approved, and compliance filing required. |
| |
Petition of CenterPoint Energy for Approval of a Miscellaneous Rate Change Related to Transportation Service Daily Balancing Charges. (PUC: McIntyre; OES: Comments - Griffing)
|
| *6 |
E002/M-10-878;
E002/M-99-799
|
Northern States Power Company d/b/a Xcel Energy |
Approved; revised tariff required; and report required. |
| |
In the Matter of the Compliance Filing and Petition of Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, to Address a City Requested Facilities Surcharge (CRFS) Tariff Modifications.
Should the Commission accept Xcel Energy's tariff modifications and apply the final tariff terms to the Robbinsdale and New Brighton over-recovered projects? (PUC: Briefing Papers - McIntyre)
|
| **7 |
E015/M-10-799
|
Minnesota Power |
TCR approved with excluded costs; future documentation required. |
| |
In the Matter of Minnesota Power's Petition for Approval of its Transmission Cost Recovery Rider.
Should the Commission approve Minnesota Power's Petition for its 2011 Transmission Cost Recovery Rider? (PUC: Briefing Papers - Fittipaldi)
|
ORAL ARGUMENT ITEMS
No Items
|
* One star indicates agenda item is unusual but is not disputed.
** Two stars indicate a disputed item or significant legal or procedural issue to be resolved.
(Ex Parte Rules apply)
|
|