|
|
Agenda
Thursday, August 05, 2010
9:30 AM start time
Utilities represented: Natural Gas, Electricity, Energy Facilities
|
To view all documents related to the following Agenda items, visit eDockets
|
DELIBERATION ITEMS
No Items
|
DECISION ITEMS
| **1 |
G999/C1-09-409
|
All Regulated Natural Gas Utilities |
Requirements set. |
| |
In the Matter of a Commission Investigation into Gas Utility Service Quality Standards.
Natural Gas Service Quality Reporting Requirements for CenterPoint Energy, Minnesota Energy Resources Corporation, Interstate Power and Xcel Energy. (PUC: Briefing Papers - Harding)
|
| **2 |
E002/M-09-1048
|
Northern States Power Company d/b/a/ Xcel Energy |
April 27, 2010 order reaffirmed. |
| |
In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, for Approval of a Modification to its TCR Tariff, 2010 Project Eligibility, TCR Rate Factors, Continuation of Deferred Accounting and 2009 True-up Report.
Should the Commission change or clarify its Order of April 27, 2010 in the Matter of Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Petition for Approval of a Modification to its TCR Tariff, 2010 Project Eligibility, TCR Rate Factors, Continuation of Deferred Accounting and 2009 True-up Report? (PUC: Briefing Papers - Fittipaldi, Gonzalez)
|
| **3 |
ET2,E002 et al/CN-06-1115
|
Great River Energy,
Northern States Power Company & Others
|
Rehearing delay to Brookings Project's in-service date, and motion to compel all denied. Filings required. |
| |
In the Matter of the Application of Great River Energy, Northern States Power Company (d/b/a Xcel Energy) and Others for Certificates of Need for the Three CapX 345-kV Transmission Projects.
Should the Commission accept without recertification the proposed change in timing for the in-service date of the Brookings to Hampton Corner 345 kV transmission line? (PUC: Briefing Papers - Eknes)
|
| 4 |
E6675/MC-10-618
|
ITC Midwest, LLC |
Approved with conditions. |
| |
In the Matter of the Application by ITC Midwest, LLC for a Minor Alternation to the Lakefield Junction Substation in Jackson County, Minnesota.
Should the Commission authorize a minor alteration for the proposed Lakefield Junction substation expansion? If so, what conditions, if any, should attach to the minor alteration? (PUC: Kaluzniak; OES: Briefing Papers - Kirsch)
|
ORAL ARGUMENT ITEMS
No Items
|
* One star indicates agenda item is unusual but is not disputed.
** Two stars indicate a disputed item or significant legal or procedural issue to be resolved.
(Ex Parte Rules apply)
|
|